Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Geedi's avatar

Patrick Gilkes assessment of Barre is laughable. His regime wasn't tyrannical or repressive whatsoever, he was highly popular throughout the 70s and 80s. The "opposition" groups that came about were disgruntled officers and criminals who were on Ethiopia's payroll to cause instability and wear on Somalia. They didn't represent the Somali public's views and perception on Barre as seen from the fact that there were no major protests or widespread recruitment within those rebel groups (they had to set up base within Ethiopia).

Mogadishu after Barre left was still mostly intact, it was the rebels like Aideed and Mahdi who chose to continue fighting and made Mogadisu and other nearby areas battlegrounds. Mind you, Barre left in 1991, it was only after that the war's intensity increases greatly so how can one blame Barre for destroying Mogadishu when he lost power completely?

Expand full comment
Mohamed Kheir Omer's avatar

Interesting, thanks for sharing

Expand full comment

No posts